
If you're a founder or early-stage startup, you've probably asked: "Should I spend my ad budget on LinkedIn or Facebook?"
Both platforms are powerful, but they serve different audiences, goals, and sales cycles. Choosing the right channel can be the difference between scaling and burning cash or closing high-value clients.
This guide breaks down LinkedIn Ads vs Facebook Ads in 2025 — costs, targeting, use cases, and ROI — so you can confidently decide where to spend.
Audience: Professionals, founders, decision-makers, B2B buyers.
Best for: SaaS, consulting, hiring platforms, B2B services.
Mindset: Users are in a business frame of mind — higher-quality leads.
Example: A startup like CreoX promoting "Verified Talent Pools" to staffing agencies finds LinkedIn perfect.
Audience: General consumers, interest-based targeting, B2C markets.
Best for: D2C products, eCommerce, lifestyle apps.
Mindset: Users are in a social/entertainment frame of mind — lower intent but wider reach.
Example: A new fitness app targeting "young professionals interested in health" can scale fast via Facebook.
Average CPC: $6–$12
CPM (per 1,000 impressions): $25–$35
Lead Gen Forms cost more, but leads are often decision-makers.
Average CPC: $0.80–$3
CPM: $6–$12
Cheaper traffic, but may require higher lead qualification efforts.
LinkedIn = Expensive clicks, but qualified B2B leads.
Facebook = Cheap clicks, but more top-of-funnel leads.
Job title, seniority, company size, industry.
Ideal for reaching founders, CEOs, hiring managers.
Can layer ABM (Account-Based Marketing).
Interests, behaviors, demographics, custom audiences.
Strong for consumer behavior (e.g., shopping, lifestyle, hobbies).
Retargeting via pixel is extremely powerful.
LinkedIn: Sponsored Content, Message Ads (InMail), Lead Gen Forms, Carousel Ads.
Facebook: Image Ads, Video Ads, Dynamic Product Ads, Stories, Reels.
Pro Tip: Video performs well on both platforms, but LinkedIn users expect value-driven messaging while Facebook users respond to entertaining storytelling.
Lower lead volume, higher quality.
Ideal if your product has high LTV (Lifetime Value) and long sales cycles.
Example: Selling a $20K B2B SaaS deal after 1–2 clients from LinkedIn = ROI is positive.
Higher lead volume, lower quality.
Ideal if you're testing product-market fit or need fast traction.
Example: Driving 10,000 app installs at $1.50/install to validate user retention.
You're targeting decision-makers (e.g., B2B SaaS, HR Tech, FinTech).
Your ticket size is $5,000+ per client.
You need quality `>` quantity.
You're in B2C, D2C, or lifestyle products.
Your goal is awareness, installs, or quick conversions.
You need to test product-market fit before scaling.
Ran $5,000 on LinkedIn targeting "HR Directors."
CPC = $9 → 555 clicks → 120 leads → 10 qualified demos → 3 clients @ $12K each.
ROI = $36K revenue – $5K spend = $31K net.
Ran $5,000 on Facebook targeting "students & professionals."
CPC = $1.20 → 4,166 clicks → 2,500 installs → 500 retained users.
ROI depends on LTV per user (ads useful for quick traction).
Choose LinkedIn if you're B2B, want fewer but highly qualified leads, and can afford higher CPCs.
Choose Facebook if you're B2C, testing fast, or running brand awareness at scale.
Best Strategy? — Many startups run LinkedIn for quality B2B leads and Facebook for brand awareness/retargeting simultaneously.
In 2025, the debate isn't really "LinkedIn vs Facebook." It's about aligning platform + audience + budget + business model.
At Visibol, we help startups cut through the noise by:
Designing the right ad mix for your GTM stage.
Running data-driven campaigns across LinkedIn & Facebook.
Optimizing for leads that convert, not just clicks.